MetAMINO® ATLAS Edition 3

Trial insight

Alternative image

Effects of methionine sources on growth performance, carcass and meat quality in finishing pigs

Collaborative research trial by Evonik, University of Illinois, USA and the Sunswine Group, USA

Published in: Translational Animal Science, Volume 8, 2024, txae088, https://doi.org/10.1093/tas/txae088

Overall, daily feed intake, growth performance as well as carcass characteristics and meat quality of finishing pigs are not different when the diets are adequately balanced by using DL-methionine (DL-Met) or L-methionine (L-Met) to MHA-Ca ratio of 65:100 on a product basis. Results from this trial showed that balancing pig diets using DL-Met instead of MHA-Ca at a ratio of 65:100 on a product basis generates an extra income of 1.00 US$ per pig.


Alternative image
In a comprehensive performance and carcass evaluation trial, we validated that 100 parts of MHA-Ca can be replaced with 65 parts of MetAMINO® without affecting growth performance, carcass characteristics and meat quality of pigs.
Dr. John Htoo

Global Senior Expert Swine, Evonik

The objective of the study was to evaluate the effect of dietary supplementation with 65 parts of DL-Met or L-Met replacing 100 parts of MHA-Ca on growth performance, carcass composition, and meat quality of finishing pigs.

Location: University of Illinois, Urbana, USA
Project team leaders: Prof. Bailey N. Harsh, Dr. Casey Bradley, Dr. Maria Mendoza, Dr. John Htoo

Animals240 pigs, 120 barrows and 120 gilts
(body weight 25.3 ± 3.5 kg; PIC Genetics 359 x Camborough)
Design20 pens/treatment with 4 pigs/pen
HousingPigs were housed in single-sex pens with 4 pigs per pen (1.18 m2/pig).
A total of 60 pens were used, each containing a nipple waterer,
single-space dry-box feeder, and slatted floors.  
Diets

1) DL-methionine (DL-Met) diet,
2) L-methionine (L-Met) diet,
3) MHA-Ca diet.

MHA-Ca was supplemented based on 65% bioefficacy for MHA compared with
DL-Met or L-Met on product basis.
Diets were adequate in all nutrients.

FeedingDiets and water were offered ad libitum.
Pigs were fed commonly, phase 1 diets (day 0 to 27) and phase 2 diets (day 27 to 55).
The experimental diets were tested only during phase 3 and 4 (day 55 to 104).
ParametersAverage daily gain, average daily feed intake, and gain:feed.
One pig per pen was selected (closest to pen average) for carcass quality.
Duration104 days

Trial results

  • Pigs used in the study had optimal performance. Final body weight (BW) on day 104 was not different when the diet was supplemented with DL-Met, L-Met or MHA-Ca using an average bioefficacy of 65% for MHA relative to DL-Met or L-Met (Figure 1).
  • Average daily gain and feed intake during phase 3, 4 or overall (phase 3 & 4) period were not different when the diet was adequately balanced by using DL-Met (or L-Met) to MHA-Ca ratio of 65:100 (Figures 2 and 3). Consequently, gain: feed was not affected.​
  • Carcass yield as well as loin eye area and back fat thickness of pigs at the end of the trial were not different when dietary methionine was supplemented at a DL-Met to MHA-Ca ratio of 65:100 on a product basis (Table 1).
  • Meat quality and color scores were also not affected when using 65% bioefficacy for MHA relative to DL-Met or L-Met (Table 2).​
  • An economic analysis showed that there is an advantage of 1.00 US$ per pig when pigs were fed the 65 part of MetAMINO® diet compared to pigs fed 100 parts MHA-Ca diet (Table 3).

Final body weight of pigs at day 104

Alternative image
Final body weight was not affected when using 65% bioefficacy for MHA relative to DL-Met or L-Met

Average daily gain of pigs from day 55 to 104

Alternative image
Average daily gain was not different when using 65% bioefficacy for MHA relative to DL-Met or L-Met

Average daily feed intake of pigs from day 55 to 104

Alternative image
Average daily feed intake was similar when using 65% bioefficacy for MHA relative to DL-Met or L-Met

Carcass weight and yield in finishing pigs fed different methionine sources

Alternative image
Carcass weight and yield were not affected when using 65% bioefficacy for MHA relative to DL-Met or L-Met

Meat quality and color of finishing pigs

Alternative image
Meat quality and color were not affected when using 65% bioefficacy for MHA relative to DL-Met or L-Met

Economic analysis of different methionine sources for finishing pigs

Alternative image

Further information and downloads


Get in touch with our experts

Whether you run a feed mill or livestock operation, produce meat, dairy, or eggs – Evonik is here to support you. Wherever you're located and whatever your needs, our Evonik Animal Nutrition specialists are ready to assist you.

Contact us
Get in touch with the experts of Evonik Animal Nutrition.

Explore further trials

Alternative image

Nitrogen retention in growing pigs

A University of Illinois, USA study shows that DL‑methionine and MHA‑Ca deliver comparable nitrogen retention when used at a 65:100 product ratio – confirming the 65% bioefficacy of MHA‑Ca.

Alternative image

Effects of Met+Cys:Lys ratio and methionine sources on broiler performance

A trial conducted in collaboration with a broiler integrator in Georgia, USA, evaluated liquid MHA-FA and DL-Met at different Met+Cys:Lys ratios to assess their effects on broiler growth performance.